outside the capitol building

01.22.21

MHA Today | January 22, 2021

Actions

Type

MHA Today

MHA Today is provided as a service to members of the Missouri Hospital Association.

Past issues are available in the Media Library.

Insights

The 2021 legislative session is underway.

This week, the Missouri Senate held a hearing on two bills that include COVID-19 liability protections — including Senate Bill 51 sponsored by Sen. Luetkemeyer and Senate Bill 42 sponsored by Sen. White. MHA participates in a coalition of organizations promoting expedited adoption of COVID-19 liability protections for health care providers. Dana Frese, Executive Vice President of Claims and General Counsel of Healthcare Services Group, testified on behalf of Missouri’s hospitals at the hearing.

Last year’s session was cut short due to the pandemic and ended without establishing protections for providers and other organizations. Gov. Parson added COVID-19 liability to the fall special session, but time ran short due to multiple competing issues, leading to the governor’s withdrawal of his call on the matter.

Liability reform is always a significant legislative challenge. Missouri’s trial attorneys are an astute and politically powerful opponent of efforts to pass any meaningful tort reform. The pandemic is unlikely to change their position. Moreover, some attorneys already are beginning to seek instances of potential harm to build cases.

In the pending legislation, medical liability protections are merged with other types of tort reform. This will bring the power of partners but also provide a larger target for opponents. Also, successful legislation would not provide protections for actions taken before the effective date. Nonetheless, the legislation is important.

The pandemic will continue throughout 2021, reverberating through our health system and economy even as we work toward widespread immunity. As a result, we are striving for supermajority approval to allow the enacted bill to take effect immediately upon the governor’s signature. We’re also supportive of a carve out from protections for conduct that was malicious or intentional.

Since March 2020, we have fought COVID-19 with every tool in our tool box. We’ve supported public health measures to prevent spread, and stopped medically necessary but deferrable procedures to conserve personal protective equipment and safeguard hospital capacity.

While hospitals have worked tirelessly to deliver lifesaving care at the bedside, scientists — moving very quickly — delivered various treatments to mitigate the harm of COVID-19. From convalescent plasma and remdesivir to warp speed vaccines, treatments and prophylactics were approved and acted as just-in-time interventions throughout the pandemic.

It’s impossible to argue that these efforts haven’t saved lives. It also is hard to imagine that — as we’ve used these tools to fight a novel virus and pull patients back from the brink — no harm was done. And, that’s the issue.

Last year, hospitals learned, adapted and mobilized to deliver care by mustering these best available tools to improve outcomes and save lives. The reward should not be lawsuits.

Let me know what you are thinking.

Herb Kuhn, MHA President & CEO

 

 

Herb B. Kuhn
MHA President and CEO

In This Issue

White House Pauses Eleventh-Hour Trump Administration Regulations
CMS Releases FAQ About Market-Based MS-DRG Relative Weights
MLN Connects Provider eNews Available
GAO Report Examines Rural Hospital Closures
Drug Policy Alliance Offers Diversity In The Field Of Addiction Webinar
DHSS, DSS, CTF Update Safe Sleep Resources
Missouri State Board Of Nursing Releases 2020 Nursing Workforce Report
HRSA Announces Behavioral Health Workforce Education And Training Grant
APS Presents 340B Webinar Series
APS, CI Security Offer Cyber Security Training

Regulatory News
Quality and Population Health
Workforce
Noteworthy
Back to Top